![]() Danchenko to canvass contacts in Russia and Europe about Mr. They paid a law firm, which paid a research firm, which in turn subcontracted to a firm run by Christopher Steele, a former British spy. The dossier was indirectly funded by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Trump’s 2016 campaign was conspiring with Russia. Danchenko, an analyst who was born in Russia and is now based in the United States, centered on two of his sources for the so-called Steele dossier, a compendium of political opposition research that asserted that Mr. He is also expected to submit a final report to the Justice Department this year. Durham’s last courtroom act as a prosecutor. Throughout his 2008-2012 investigation, he found no one he deemed worthy of indictment even though two detainees had died in the C.I.A.’s custody, and he fought a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to avoid disclosing to the public his findings and witness interview records. Durham had set a high bar for charges and for releasing information related to the investigation. Durham produced in his three and a half years of investigating the Trump-Russia inquiry stood in contrast to what had been the highest-profile act of his career, when he led a special investigation of the C.I.A.’s Bush-era torture of terrorism detainees and destruction of videos of interrogation sessions.Īt the time, Mr. “I submit to you that if this trial has proven anything, it’s that the special counsel’s investigation was focused on proving crimes at any cost as opposed to investigating whether any occurred,” Mr. Durham and his team had lost their way, ignoring signs of serious flaws in their cases because they were so intent on convicting someone. “We have known all along that Igor Danchenko was innocent and we are glad the American public knows that now too,” he said.ĭuring closing arguments in both the Sussmann and Danchenko cases, defense lawyers pointed to evidence they said showed that Mr. Danchenko, said the prosecution had been “a nightmare” for his client and his family. ![]() “We respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service,” he said. Durham expressed disappointment in the verdict on Tuesday, issuing the same statement he had shared after Mr. The prosecution had failed to produce sufficient evidence for that charge to even go to the jury, he said. Danchenko not guilty after deliberating for a day, the judge overseeing the trial, Anthony Trenga, took the extraordinary step last week of acquitting him on a fifth such count. It ended in an acquittal in May.Īnd even before the jurors unanimously found Mr. ![]() when he shared a tip about possible cyberlinks between Mr. The first accused Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer with ties to Democrats, of lying to the F.B.I. But once the cases reached courtrooms, they both crumbled. While the cases were not as expansive as Trump supporters had expected, they nevertheless provided more fodder for grievances about the Russia investigation. Trump for collusion with Russia, though he did not charge any such conspiracy. ![]() He crammed the indictments with extraneous material and insinuations that he thought Democrats had sought to frame Mr. Instead he developed two cases centered on the narrow charge of making false statements in outside efforts to scrutinize purported links between Mr. Durham never charged any high-level government officials. Trump and his supporters had long insisted the Durham inquiry would prove a “deep state” conspiracy against him, but despite pursuing various such claims, Mr. Barr three years ago to scour the F.B.I.’s inquiry into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia for any wrongdoing. Durham, the special counsel appointed by Attorney General William P. The verdict was a final blow to the politically charged criminal investigation by John H. Trump and Russia, was acquitted on Tuesday on four counts of lying to the F.B.I. WASHINGTON - Igor Danchenko, an analyst who provided much of the research for a notorious dossier of unproven assertions and rumors about former President Donald J.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |